Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Words of recession

'Fixing the roof when the sun is shining'

'This is a serious time for serious people'

'Boom to bust'

'Borrowing bombshell'

'Tax cuts are not just for Christmas'

I'm FED UP of hearing these phrases. We are completely failing to land any blows on Brown at the moment. He's getting away with everything - a devaluation of the pound, massive borrowing, enormous waste, bureaucracy, complacency, lies, smugness, incompetence - I could go on - and yet we, the Conservative Party, persist in using these lame soundbites to persuade a recession-doomed electorate that we are the best Party to deal with the current climate.

It appears that leading politicians have no faith that what might be considered economic 'jargon' is comprehensible by the public at large. Instead, we prefer to regurgitate weak and ineffective soundbites which best befit the language of the playground.

This is no time for weasel words.

Oh, there's another one.

I'm continually irked by Dave and George's approach on the economy. Until yesterday, DC looked ridiculous by continuing to abide by the pretence that the Tories would match Labour's future spending plans. We must be able to offer considerable tax cuts now, but not by borrowing - but by CUTTING. The electorate cannot continue to have it both ways. In times like these, if they want more money in their pockets, they should have to sacrifice something else. There is no doubt that there is money to be saved in the NHS, and we should not shirk from our responsibility to say so. The NHS is not sacred. The NHS is not the ONLY welfare solution. The NHS is wasteful, bloated and unaccountable.

We have, frankly, looked silly throughout the duration of this crisis. And the longer it goes on, the more opportunity we have to look more silly. Where are the big guns? Where is Ken Clarke? If we were so confident Labour would destroy the economy then why is the Shadow Chancellorship lumbered with such a lightweight? George Osborne comes across as an amateur, with little clue of how to handle events, and appears to suffer complete lack of nouse, lack of judgement and inability to attack the government properly. He still sounds shrill and is open to complete ridicule, allegedly considerable intellect notwithstanding.

I am in a state of utter despair. Our 'motherhood and apple pie' policies have been completely overtaken by events. The latest poll indicates that Labour would be the largest party in the House of Commons in the event of a general election. This is a disaster. If they win a fourth term, the consequences are unthinkably grave for the country and our Party. We need to get back to scoring consistent double-digit leads, given that, with the possibility of a 2009 election around the corner, Labour lies about 'cuts' will probably gain favour with some of the electorate. We therefore need a big lead going into any campaign in order to protect it.

We must also remember the lessons of 1992. Before that election, it was unprecedented for a Party which was behind in the polls at the beginning of a campaign to emerge victorious on polling day. That precedent has been set. We must never let the attack die down.

I have never despised Gordon Brown more than I do at this very moment - trouble is, I have never doubted the opposition's ability to win more than I do now.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I think they are finding it difficult to make anything stick for two main reasons.

1. It's impossible to disprove futurology, which is essentially what all fiscal suggestions are at the moment. Whatever Brown suggests, and whatever ones' position on Keynesianism or anything else, nobody can PROVE him wrong. Even economists can only say what they think, nothing more. Until it GOES wrong, it will remain this way.

2. Nobody in the real world now cares about what has gone before because the present problems are so grave. Blaming Brown for the current crisis sounds tired, weak and slightly pathetic. This is where I am in complete agreement with the above; the Tories are not doing enough. (However, part of that relates to 1.)

Moreover, I would argue the problem is a wider one. When real people are hit by a problem in the real economy, they enter survival mode. The business of which politician says what about which particular economic suggestion is irrelevant. It will make no immediate tangible difference to their money problems, and as in all times of crisis, the status quo - the known devil as it were - is naturally preferable. The people who are aware of the massive ineptitude of GB & Co and the minutiae of Westminsterial differences of opinion are not most people; they are not, by and large, the people talking to pollsters, and consequently you see polls beginning to reflect a preference for the status quo.

IMHO the only hope is that eventually the majority begin to notice that the problems are not going away, and that unless they vote Conservative, neither will Brown. For that reason, an early election would be both unsurprising and a total disaster. Here's hoping.